top of page

๐—ง๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ, ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ต: ๐—–๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป > ๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ง๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜

  • Writer: Alison Conigliaro-Hubbard
    Alison Conigliaro-Hubbard
  • May 8
  • 2 min read

๐—ข๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐˜†, ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—บ๐—ฒ - ๐—œโ€™๐—บ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐—™๐—˜๐— ๐—” ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐˜†. ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐—ถ๐˜โ€™๐—น๐—น ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ. (๐—˜๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—บ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ง ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ๐˜€.)


I was out on a walk recently, listening to a podcast when something caught my ear:


A proposal in the current U.S. administration to break FEMA (the organization that coordinates disaster recovery and response in the US) into parts that would plug into other organizations. The hosts raised an important concern - that fragmenting FEMA might make things less efficient, not more.


It immediately brought me back to my early days in networking (not the coffee and business card kind, but the IT infrastructure kind).


Back then, we used a ๐—ต๐˜‚๐—ฏ-๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ-๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น for storage networking:


A ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ (usually a big data center back then, but you can also think of cloud infrastructure as core these days), directing all the nodes (switches) in branch offices. It worked because that core (ideally) had visibility across the system. It could distribute policies, optimize resources, and keep the whole operation humming.


But when organizations started decentralizing those systems, something shifted.


Each branch had more local control, sure - but they also needed their own IT teams, their own processes, and their own tools.


Coordination dropped. Transparency faded. Silos grew.


And ironically? ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ.


Itโ€™s not all that different from how we build teams.


Decentralized autonomy has its place - but without shared clarity, purpose, and connection to the center, even the most talented teams can start pulling in different directions; creating their own game plans misaligned from the organization as a whole.


๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฝ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜.


It means building the connective tissue that lets each part contribute to something greater.


๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—บ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟโ€”๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ.


Because when the core is strong, the whole organization moves smarter.


๐—œโ€™๐—บ ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€: Have you ever worked in a system where the โ€œcenterโ€ was missing? What happened? Iโ€™d love to hear your perspective.



Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page